The Firm
The Firm
Philosophy
Client Care
Diversity
Social Commitment
Awards
Awards
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Team
Practice Areas
Practice Areas
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property
Anti-counterfeiting & Custom Monitoring
Copyright
Design
Information & Communication Technology
New Plant Varieties
Patent Litigation
Trademarks
Trade Secrets
Life Sciences
Life Sciences
Pharma & Life Sciences Litigation
Regulatory (Life Sciences)
New Plant Varieties
Unified Patent Court
Antitrust/Competition
Antitrust/Competition
Antitrust Autority Investigations
Antitrust/Competition Litigation
IP & FRAND
Litigation
Litigation
Advertising Litigation
Antitrust/Competition Litigation
Commercial Litigation
Domestic & International Arbitration
Patent Litigation
Pharma & Life Sciences Litigation
Product Liability Litigation
Trademark Litigation
Commercial Law
Commercial Law
Advertising Law
Business Transactions
Commercial Litigation
Data Protection & Privacy
Labour Law
Mergers & Acquisitions
Startups
Industries
Industries
Agribusiness
Automotive
Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
Chemicals
Consumer Products
Energy
Fashion & Luxury
Food & Beverages
Industrial Equipment & Manufacturing
Insurance
Media & Entertainment
Sport
Telecommunications & Electronics
Careers
Careers
How to apply
News & Insight
News & Insight
News & Legal Updates
Press
Press
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Events
Contacts
Contacts
Offices
Offices
Milan
Rome
Parma
Bari
Italiano
News & Insight
home
News & Insight
News & Legal Updates
ChatGPT nelle aule di tribunale: utile strumento di difesa o rischio eccessivo?
ChatGPT nelle aule di tribunale: utile strumento di difesa o rischio eccessivo?
1659
ChatGPT nelle aule di tribunale: utile strumento di difesa o rischio eccessivo? - Trevisan & Cuonzo
